Association between surgery and rate of incident dementia in older adults: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of incident dementia after surgery in older adults is unclear. The study objective was to examine the rate of incident dementia among older adults after elective surgery compared with a matched nonsurgical control group. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, propensity-matched retrospective cohort study using data from linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. All community-dwelling individuals aged 66 years and older who underwent one of five major elective surgeries between April 1, 2007 and March 31, 2011 were included. Each surgical patient was matched 1:1 on surgical specialty of the surgeon at consultation, age, sex, fiscal year of entry, and propensity score with a patient who attended an outpatient visit with a surgeon of the same surgical specialty but did not undergo surgery. Patients were followed for up to 5 years after cohort entry for the occurrence of a new dementia diagnosis, defined from administrative data. Cause-specific hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between surgery and the hazard of incident dementia. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 27,878 individuals (13,939 matched pairs) were included in the analysis. A total of 640 (4.6%) individuals in the surgical group and 965 (6.9%) individuals in the control group developed dementia over the 5-year follow-up period. Individuals who underwent surgery had a reduced rate of incident dementia compared with their matched nonsurgical controls (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97; p = 0.01). This association was persistent in most subgroups and after sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Elective surgery did not increase the rate of incident dementia when compared with matched nonsurgical controls. This could be an important consideration for patients and surgeons when elective surgery is considered.

Hearing Loss and Dementia: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hearing loss (HL) is considered a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia. We aimed to examine the relationship between HL and incident dementia diagnosis in a province-wide population-based cohort study with matched controls. METHODS: Administrative healthcare databases were linked to generate a cohort of patients who were aged ≥40 years at their first claimed hearing amplification devices (HAD) between April 2007 and March 2016 through the Assistive Devices Program (ADP) (257,285 with claims and 1,005,010 controls). The main outcome was incident dementia diagnosis, ascertained using validated algorithms. Dementia incidence was compared between cases and controls using Cox regression. Patient, disease, and other risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Dementia incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) were 19.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.26-19.77) and 14.15 (95% CI: 14.04-14.26) for the ADP claimants and matched controls, respectively. In adjusted analyses, risk of dementia was higher in ADP claimants compared with controls (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.09-1.12, p < 0.001]). Subgroup analyses showed a dose-response gradient, with risk of dementia higher among patients with bilateral HADs (HR: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.10-1.14, p < 0.001]), and an exposure-response gradient, with increasing risk over time from April 2007-March 2010 (HR: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.014]), April 2010-March 2013 (HR: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.09-1.15, p < 0.001]), and April 2013-March 2016 (HR: 1.19 [95% CI: 1.16-1.23, p < 0.001]). CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, adults with HL had an increased risk of being diagnosed with dementia. Given the implications of HL on dementia risk, understanding the effect of hearing interventions merits further investigation.

Trends and correlates of concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine and/or gabapentinoid use among Ontario nursing home residents.

BACKGROUND: A concern with long-term opioid use is the increased risk arising when opioids are used concurrently with drugs that can potentiate their associated adverse effects. The drugs most often encountered are benzodiazepines (BZDs) and gabapentinoids. Our study objectives were to examine trends in the concurrent use of opioids and BZDs, or gabapentinoids, in a Canadian nursing home population over an 11-year period, and current resident-level correlates of this concurrent use. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study among Ontario nursing home residents (>65 years) dispensed opioids between April 2009 and February 2020. For the last study year, we examined cross-sectional associations between resident characteristics and concurrent use of opioids with BZDs or gabapentinoids. Linked data on nursing home residents from clinical and health administrative databases was used. The yearly proportions of residents who were dispensed an opioid concurrently with a BZD or gabapentinoid were plotted with percent change derived from log-binomial regression models. Separate modified Poisson regression models estimated resident-level correlates of concurrent use of opioids with BZDs or gabapentinoids. RESULTS: Over the study period, among residents dispensed an opioid there was a 53.2% relative decrease (30.7% to 14.4%) in concurrent BZD and a 505.4% relative increase (4.4% to 26.6%) in concurrent gabapentinoid use. In adjusted models, increasing age and worsening cognition were inversely associated with the concurrent use of both classes, but most other significantly related covariates were unique to each drug class (e.g., sex and anxiety disorders for BZD, pain severity and presence of pain-related conditions for gabapentinoids). CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of BZDs or gabapentinoids in Ontario nursing home residents dispensed opioids remains common, but the pattern of co-use has changed over time. Observed covariates of concurrent use in 2019/20 suggest distinct but overlapping resident populations requiring consideration of the relative risks versus benefits of this co-use and monitoring for potential harm.

Association of topical glaucoma medications with lacrimal drainage obstruction and eyelid malposition.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Adverse effects of topical glaucoma medications (TGMs) may include development of ocular adnexal disorders. We undertook a study to determine the effect of TGMs on the risk of developing lacrimal drainage obstruction (LDO) and eyelid malposition. SUBJECTS/METHODS: All patients 66 years of age and older in Ontario, Canada initiating TGM and all patients diagnosed with glaucoma/suspected glaucoma but not receiving TGM from 2002 to 2018 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Using validated healthcare administrative databases, cohorts were identified with TGM and no TGM patients matched 1:2 on sex and birth year. The effect of TGM treatment on risk of surgery for LDO and lid malpositions was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Cohorts included 122,582 patients in the TGM cohort and 232,336 patients in the no TGM cohort. Among the TGM cohort there was decreased event-free survival for entropion (log-rank P < 0.001), trichiasis (P < 0.001), and LDO (P = 0.006), and increased ectropion-free survival (P = 0.007). No difference in ptosis-free survival was detected (P = 0.78). For the TGM cohort there were increased hazards for entropion (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.37; P < 0.001), trichiasis (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.57-1.94; P < 0.001), and LDO (at 15 years: HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.49-3.85; P = 0.004), and a decreased hazard for ectropion (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97; P = 0.008). No association between TGM treatment and ptosis hazard was detected (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89-1.09; P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: TGMs are associated with an increased risk of undergoing surgery for LDO, entropion, and trichiasis.

Association of Linezolid With Risk of Serotonin Syndrome in Patients Receiving Antidepressants.

Importance: Linezolid has the potential to interact with some antidepressants, leading to serotonin syndrome. However, few empirical data support warnings for patients taking antidepressants to avoid linezolid. Objectives: To examine the incidence of serotonin syndrome in patients receiving oral linezolid and how concomitant antidepressant treatment changes this risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used linked administrative databases at ICES to collect data from outpatients 66 years or older in Ontario, Canada, who were prescribed oral linezolid for any duration from October 1, 2014, to January 1, 2021, with follow-up to 30 days (January 31, 2021). Exposures: The use of antidepressants while receiving linezolid therapy vs no antidepressant use while receiving linezolid therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinically significant serotonin syndrome based on a physician diagnosis, Sternbach criteria, or the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria within 30 days of starting oral linezolid treatment. Secondary outcomes were altered mental status, hospitalization, or death within 30 days of starting linezolid treatment. Results: The study included 1134 patients (age ranges, 66-69 years for 225 patients [19.8%], 70-79 years for 473 patients [41.7%], and ≥80 years for 436 patients [38.4%]; 595 [52.5%] male) who were prescribed linezolid. Of 1134 patients, 215 (19.0%) were also taking antidepressants. Serotonin syndrome occurred in fewer than 6 patients (<0.5%). The number of serotonin syndrome cases were fewer in the antidepressant group. In a propensity score-matched cohort, the adjusted risk difference for serotonin syndrome between the antidepressant group and the no antidepressant group was -1.2% (95% CI, -2.9% to 0.5%). There were similar rates of altered mental status, hospitalization, and death between the propensity score-matched groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of older patients who were prescribed linezolid, serotonin syndrome occurred rarely. Concurrent antidepressants did not significantly increase the risk of serotonin syndrome. These findings suggested that linezolid is likely safe for patients receiving antidepressants. Nevertheless, prescribers should remain vigilant for this potential drug interaction.

Evolution of first-line glaucoma therapy, 2007-2018: a population-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term evolution of first-line glaucoma therapy (FLGT) initiated by ophthalmologists and optometrists. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study using validated provincial health care databases. PARTICIPANTS: 194,759 Ontario residents, 66 years of age or older, who received FLGT between 2007 and 2018. METHODS: A total of 194,759 individuals from 12 annual cohorts were enrolled, and rates of first-line medical treatment (prostaglandin analogue [PGA], beta-blocker, alpha-2-agonist, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor) and laser trabeculoplasty (LT) were calculated. Provider (ophthalmologist or optometrist) rates also were assessed. RESULTS: Across the entire study period, of the 194,759 enrolled individuals who received FLGT, 60.2% initially received medical treatment and 39.8% underwent LT. Approximately 94.6% were treated by ophthalmologists. PGA therapy was the most common therapy prior to 2010, whereupon LT became the most common FLGT. By 2015, LT exceeded the total of all medications as FLGT. The annual rate of initial medication prescriptions by optometrists rose to 101.4 per 100,000 population between 2011 and 2018. In 2018, PGA and non-PGA prescription rates by ophthalmologists were 2.6 and 5.0 times higher, respectively, than prescription rates by optometrists. CONCLUSION: LT therapy has become the most common FLGT for Ontario residents 66 years of age or older. PGAs remain the most frequently prescribed glaucoma medication. While ophthalmologists continue to provide the majority of FLGT, optometrists now provide a small but growing fraction of FLGT following the introduction of glaucoma medication prescribing privileges.

Correlates of Opioid Use Among Ontario Long-Term Care Residents and Variation by Pain Frequency and Intensity: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain is common among older residents of long-term care (LTC) homes and often poorly recognized and treated. With heightened concerns regarding opioid prescribing in recent years, it is important to examine the current prevalence of opioid use and its association with resident characteristics to help identify those potentially at risk of medication harms as well as suboptimal pain management. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate the prevalence and correlates of opioid use among non-palliative LTC residents and explore variation in opioid prevalence and correlates across strata defined by pain frequency and intensity. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of all older (aged > 65 years) LTC residents (excluding those with cancer or receiving palliative care) in Ontario, Canada during 2018-2019. Health administrative databases were linked with standardized clinical assessment data to ascertain residents' health and pain characteristics and their opioid and other medication use. Modified Poisson regression models estimated unadjusted and adjusted associations between residents' characteristics and opioid use, overall and across strata capturing pain frequency and intensity. RESULTS: Among 75,020 eligible residents (mean age 85.1 years; 70% female), the prevalence of opioid use was 18.5% and pain was 29.4%. Opioid use ranged from 12.2% for residents with no current pain to 55.7% for those with severe pain. In adjusted models, residents newly admitted to LTC (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.62) and with moderate to severe cognitive impairment (aRR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.72) or dementia (aRR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.79) were significantly less likely to receive an opioid, whereas residents with select conditions (e.g., arthritis, aRR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.32-1.41) and concurrently using gabapentinoids (aRR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.74-1.86), benzodiazepines (aRR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.38), or antidepressants (aRR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.27-1.35) were significantly more likely to receive an opioid. The associations observed for residents newly admitted, with dementia, and concurrently using gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants were largely consistent across all pain strata. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings describe resident sub-groups at potentially higher risk of adverse health outcomes in relation to both opioid use and non-use. LTC clinical and policy changes informed by research are required to ensure the appropriate recognition and management of non-cancer pain in this setting.

In older adults having hip fracture surgery, regional vs. general anesthesia did not reduce postoperative delirium.

SOURCE CITATION: Li T, Li J, Yuan L, et al. Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on incidence of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: the RAGA randomized trial. JAMA. 2022;327:50-8. 34928310.

How to identify balance disorders and reduce fall risk.

A multifactorial risk assessment, correction of hearing impairment, exercise, and an optimized home environment can help prevent imbalance-related falls.

Safety Profile of Linezolid in Older Adults With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: The objective of this study was to characterize the safety profile of linezolid in patients with renal impairment compared with patients without renal impairment. Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study using linked administrative databases included patients aged 66 years or older in Ontario, Canadawho were prescribed linezolid from 2014 to 2021. Renal impairment was defined using baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or receipt of dialysis. The primary outcomes were change in platelet count and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 109/L) within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, optic neuropathy, acidosis, serotonin syndrome, and mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on baseline health. Results: Of 625 patients, 98 (15.7%) patients had renal impairment. The mean (SD) platelet change was -88.3 (108.4) 109/L in the renal impairment group and -76.5 (109.8) 109/L in the no renal impairment group, with an adjusted mean difference of -29.4 (95% CI, -53.4 to -5.3; P = .0165). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred in 9.2% for the renal impairment group and 5.9% for the no renal impairment group, with an adjusted risk difference of 2.7% (95% CI, -3.1% to 8.6%; P = .3655). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Patients with renal impairment on linezolid therapy had a larger decrease in platelet count, but their risks for severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding were not significantly different than patients without renal impairment. Linezolid is likely safe in renal impairment without dose adjustment or drug level monitoring.

Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a community setting.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and related forms of dementia are becoming increasingly prevalent with the aging of many populations. The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease relies on tests to evaluate cognition and discriminate between individuals with dementia and those without dementia. The Mini-Cog is a brief, cognitive screening test that is frequently used to evaluate cognition in older adults in various settings. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review was to determine the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in a community setting. Secondary objectives included investigations of the heterogeneity of test accuracy in the included studies and potential sources of heterogeneity. These potential sources of heterogeneity included the baseline prevalence of dementia in study samples, thresholds used to determine positive test results, the type of dementia (Alzheimer's disease dementia or all causes of dementia), and aspects of study design related to study quality. Overall, the goals of this review were to determine if the Mini-Cog is a cognitive screening test that could be recommended to screen for cognitive impairment in community settings. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), Science Citation Index (Web of Science), BIOSIS previews (Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), and the Cochrane Dementia Group's developing register of diagnostic test accuracy studies to March 2013. We used citation tracking (using the database's 'related articles' feature, where available) as an additional search method and contacted authors of eligible studies for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all cross-sectional studies that utilized the Mini-Cog as an index test for the diagnosis of dementia when compared to a reference standard diagnosis of dementia using standardized dementia diagnostic criteria. For the current review we only included studies that were conducted on samples from community settings, and excluded studies that were conducted in primary care or secondary care settings. We considered studies to be conducted in a community setting where participants were sampled from the general population. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information from studies meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted including information on the characteristics of participants in the studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria and summarized using risk of bias applicability and summary graphs. We extracted information on the diagnostic test accuracy of studies including the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals of these measures and summarized the findings using forest plots. Study specific sensitivities and specificities were also plotted in receiver operating curve space. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1620 participants. The sensitivities of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies were reported as 0.99, 0.76 and 0.99. The specificity of the Mini-Cog varied in the individual studies and was 0.93, 0.89 and 0.83. There was clinical and methodological heterogeneity between the studies which precluded a pooled meta-analysis of the results. Methodological limitations were present in all the studies introducing potential sources of bias, specifically with respect to the methods for participant selection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are currently few studies assessing the diagnostic test accuracy of the Mini-Cog in community settings. The limited number of studies and the methodological limitations that are present in the current studies make it difficult to provide recommendations for or against the use of the Mini-Cog as a cognitive screening test in community settings. Additional well-designed studies comparing the Mini-Cog to other brief cognitive screening tests are required in order to determine the accuracy and utility of the Mini-Cog in community based settings.

Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a secondary care setting.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias relies on clinical assessment. There is a high prevalence of cognitive disorders, including undiagnosed dementia in secondary care settings. Short cognitive tests can be helpful in identifying those who require further specialist diagnostic assessment; however, there is a lack of consensus around the optimal tools to use in clinical practice. The Mini-Cog is a short cognitive test comprising three-item recall and a clock-drawing test that is used in secondary care settings. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in a secondary care setting. The secondary objectives were to investigate the heterogeneity of test accuracy in the included studies and potential sources of heterogeneity. These potential sources of heterogeneity will include the baseline prevalence of dementia in study samples, thresholds used to determine positive test results, the type of dementia (Alzheimer's disease dementia or all causes of dementia), and aspects of study design related to study quality. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following sources in September 2012, with an update to 12 March 2019: Cochrane Dementia Group Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), BIOSIS Previews (Web of Knowledge), Science Citation Index (ISI Web of Knowledge), PsycINFO (OvidSP), and LILACS (BIREME). We made no exclusions with regard to language of Mini-Cog administration or language of publication, using translation services where necessary. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included cross-sectional studies and excluded case-control designs, due to the risk of bias. We selected those studies that included the Mini-Cog as an index test to diagnose dementia where dementia diagnosis was confirmed with reference standard clinical assessment using standardised dementia diagnostic criteria. We only included studies in secondary care settings (including inpatient and outpatient hospital participants). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened all titles and abstracts generated by the electronic database searches. Two review authors independently checked full papers for eligibility and extracted data. We determined quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) using the QUADAS-2 tool. We extracted data into two-by-two tables to allow calculation of accuracy metrics for individual studies, reporting the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals of these measures, summarising them graphically using forest plots. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 2560 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria, set in neuropsychology outpatient referrals, outpatients attending a general medicine clinic, and referrals to a memory clinic. Only n = 1415 (55.3%) of participants were included in the analysis to inform evaluation of Mini-Cog test accuracy, due to the selective use of available data by study authors. There were concerns related to high risk of bias with respect to patient selection, and unclear risk of bias and high concerns related to index test conduct and applicability. In all studies, the Mini-Cog was retrospectively derived from historic data sets. No studies included acute general hospital inpatients. The prevalence of dementia ranged from 32.2% to 87.3%. The sensitivities of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies were reported as 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.71), 0.60 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.72), and 0.87 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.90). The specificity of the Mini-Cog for each individual study was 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.92), 0.65 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.73), and 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.00). We did not perform meta-analysis due to concerns related to risk of bias and heterogeneity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review identified only a limited number of diagnostic test accuracy studies using Mini-Cog in secondary care settings. Those identified were at high risk of bias related to patient selection and high concerns related to index test conduct and applicability. The evidence was indirect, as all studies evaluated Mini-Cog differently from the review question, where it was anticipated that studies would conduct Mini-Cog and independently but contemporaneously perform a reference standard assessment to diagnose dementia. The pattern of test accuracy varied across the three studies. Future research should evaluate Mini-Cog as a test in itself, rather than derived from other neuropsychological assessments. There is also a need for evaluation of the feasibility of the Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia to help adequately determine its role in the clinical pathway.

Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia are becoming increasingly common with the aging of most populations. The majority of individuals with dementia will first present for care and assessment in primary care settings. There is a need for brief dementia screening instruments that can accurately detect dementia in primary care settings. The Mini-Cog is a brief, cognitive screening test that is frequently used to evaluate cognition in older adults in various settings. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in a primary care setting. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, MEDLINE, Embase and four other databases, initially to September 2012. Since then, four updates to the search were performed using the same search methods, and the most recent was January 2017. We used citation tracking (using the databases' 'related articles' feature, where available) as an additional search method and contacted authors of eligible studies for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: We only included studies that evaluated the Mini-Cog as an index test for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia or related forms of dementia when compared to a reference standard using validated criteria for dementia. We only included studies that were conducted in primary care populations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted and described information on the characteristics of the study participants and study setting. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria we evaluated the quality of studies, and we assessed risk of bias and applicability of each study for each domain in QUADAS-2. Two review authors independently extracted information on the true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives and entered the data into Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). We then used RevMan 5 to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals. We summarized the sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog in the individual studies in forest plots and also plotted them in a receiver operating characteristic plot. We also created a 'Risk of bias' and applicability concerns graph to summarize information related to the quality of included studies. MAIN RESULTS: There were a total of four studies that met our inclusion criteria, including a total of 1517 total participants. The sensitivity of the Mini-Cog varied between 0.76 to 1.00 in studies while the specificity varied between 0.27 to 0.85. The included studies displayed significant heterogeneity in both methodologies and clinical populations, which did not allow for a meta-analysis to be completed. Only one study (Holsinger 2012) was found to be at low risk of bias on all methodological domains. The results of this study reported that the sensitivity of the Mini-Cog was 0.76 and the specificity was 0.73. We found the quality of all other included studies to be low due to a high risk of bias with methodological limitations primarily in their selection of participants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited number of studies evaluating the accuracy of the Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of dementia in primary care settings. Given the small number of studies, the wide range in estimates of the accuracy of the Mini-Cog, and methodological limitations identified in most of the studies, at the present time there is insufficient evidence to recommend that the Mini-Cog be used as a screening test for dementia in primary care. Further studies are required to determine the accuracy of Mini-Cog in primary care and whether this tool has sufficient diagnostic test accuracy to be useful as a screening test in this setting.

Surgical Outcomes among Focused versus Diversified Cataract Surgeons.

PURPOSE: Narrowly focused surgical practice has become increasingly common in ophthalmology and may have an effect on surgical outcomes. Previous research evaluating the influence of surgical focus on cataract surgical outcomes has been lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether surgeons' exclusive surgical focus on cataract surgery influences the risk of cataract surgical adverse events. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients 66 years of age or older undergoing cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2013. METHODS: Outcomes of isolated cataract surgery performed by exclusive cataract surgeons (no other types of surgery performed), moderately diversified cataract surgeons (1%-50% noncataract procedures), and highly diversified cataract surgeons (>50% noncataract procedures) were evaluated using linked healthcare databases and controlling for patient-, surgeon-, and institution-level covariates. Surgeon-level covariates included both surgeon experience and surgical volume. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite outcome incorporating 4 adverse events: posterior capsule rupture, dropped lens fragments, retinal detachment, and suspected endophthalmitis. RESULTS: The study included 1 101 864 cataract operations. Patients had a median age of 76 years, and 60.2% were female. Patients treated by the 3 groups of surgeons were similar at baseline. Adverse events occurred in 0.73%, 0.78%, and 2.31% of cases performed by exclusive cataract surgeons, moderately diversified surgeons, and highly diversified surgeons, respectively. The risk of cataract surgical adverse events for patients operated on by moderately diversified surgeons was not different than for patients operated on by exclusive cataract surgeons (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.18). Patients operated on by highly diversified surgeons had a higher risk of adverse events than patients operated on by exclusive cataract surgeons (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.09-2.14). This resulted in an absolute risk difference of 0.016 (95% CI, 0.012-0.020) and a number needed to harm of 64 (95% CI, 50-87). CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive surgical focus did not affect the safety of cataract surgery when compared with moderate levels of surgical diversification. The risk of cataract surgical adverse events was higher among surgeons whose practice was dedicated mainly to noncataract surgery.

Distribution and Predictors of Initial Glaucoma Care Among Ophthalmologists and Optometrists: A Population-based Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate evolution in the distribution of new glaucoma patients between ophthalmologists and optometrists, and to examine factors predicting provider type, in the context of expansion in the scope of optometry practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A population-based study was undertaken using validated datasets in Ontario, Canada from 2007 to 2018, encompassing time before and after optometry practice scope expansion in 2011. All patients aged 66 and older receiving a glaucoma suspect diagnosis or first-line therapy for glaucoma from ophthalmologists or optometrists were enrolled. Predictors of provider type were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2018, 401,560 patients received initial glaucoma care, including 303,440 by ophthalmologists and 98,120 by optometrists. Population rates of glaucoma suspect diagnosis increased for both providers over the study period. The rate of therapy initiation increased annually among optometrists after 2011, while the rate remained stable over that period among ophthalmologists. By 2018, 88% of patients initiating therapy and 59% of patients first diagnosed as a glaucoma suspect received that care from ophthalmologists. In the final study year, therapy initiations per provider were lower among optometrists (median: 2/provider; interquartile range: 1 to 3) than among ophthalmologists (median: 26.5/provider, interquartile range: 10 to 53). Patients were more likely to receive care from an ophthalmologist than an optometrist if they were older, had higher ocular or systemic comorbidity, or lived in urban settings. CONCLUSIONS: Optometrists have a large and growing role in diagnosing glaucoma suspects; however, despite scope expansion, optometrists play a much smaller role in initiating glaucoma therapy.

Association Between Exposure to General Versus Regional Anesthesia and Risk of Dementia in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Cognitive changes are commonly observed in older adults following surgical procedures. There are concerns that exposure to general anesthesia (GA) may contribute to an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. Our study examined the associations between exposure to GA compared with regional anesthesia (RA) administered for elective surgical procedures and the development of dementia. DESIGN: Population-based propensity matched retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Linked administrative databases were accessed from ICES (formerly called the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services) in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included all community-dwelling individuals aged 66 and older who underwent one of five elective surgical procedures in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2007, and March 31, 2011. Individuals with evidence of dementia preceding cohort entry were excluded. Individuals who received GA were matched within surgical procedures to those who received RA on age, sex, cohort entry year, and a propensity score to control for potential confounders. MEASUREMENTS: The baseline characteristics of the study sample were compared before and after matching. Individuals were followed for up to 5 years following cohort entry for the occurrence of dementia using a validated algorithm. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between anesthetic type and dementia. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 7,499 matched pairs were included in the final analysis. Overall, no difference was observed in the risk of being diagnosed with dementia for individuals who received GA when compared with RA (HR = 1.0; 95% CI = .8-1.2). There was also no association between anesthesia and dementia in most subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Elective surgery using GA was not associated with an overall elevated risk of dementia when compared with RA. Future studies are required to determine whether surgery is a risk factor for dementia irrespective of anesthetic technique.

Predictors of Initial Glaucoma Therapy with Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Medication: A Population-Based Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate patient-level factors associated with first-line glaucoma therapy with laser trabeculoplasty (LT) versus topical medication. DESIGN: Population-based study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients 66 years of age and older in Ontario, Canada, receiving first-ever therapy for glaucoma with either LT or topical medication between April 1, 2007, and March 31, 2019. METHODS: Linked health care databases were used to identify patients receiving first-line glaucoma therapy and to ascertain patient-level factors potentially associated with receipt of LT versus medication. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with receiving LT versus medications were evaluated using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for age, gender, previous cataract surgery, previous corneal transplantation, previous retina surgery, level of systemic comorbidity, socioeconomic status (SES), and rural versus urban residence. RESULTS: In total, 194 759 patients were included. Older patients were less likely to be treated with LT versus medication (≥81 years of age vs. 66-70 years of age: OR, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.50), whereas women were more likely than men to receive LT (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.39-1.45). Previous ocular surgeries were associated with decreased probability of treatment with LT, including cataract surgery (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.30-0.32), corneal transplantation (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.49), and retina surgery (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.41-0.51). Patients with high comorbidity were less likely to receive LT (highest vs. lowest level of comorbidity: OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97). Laser trabeculoplasty use was less likely among patients at higher levels of SES (highest vs. lowest level: OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89) and from a rural residence (versus urban: OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95). Increasing utilization of LT over time was noted (for each additional calendar year: OR, 1.05 per year; 95% CI, 1.05-1.05 per year). CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified patient characteristics associated with use of LT as primary therapy for glaucoma, including factors related to patient demographics, ocular history, and comorbidity. Many of these associations are unexpected based on efficacy data or evidence-based guidelines. These results are topical considering growing evidence supporting use of first-line LT.

Morbidity and mortality associated with prescription cannabinoid drug use in COPD.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory-related morbidity and mortality were evaluated in relation to incident prescription oral synthetic cannabinoid (nabilone, dronabinol) use among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based, data-linkage cohort study, analysing health administrative data from Ontario, Canada, from 2006 to 2016. We identified individuals aged 66 years and older with COPD, using a highly specific, validated algorithm, excluding individuals with malignancy and those receiving palliative care (n=185 876 after exclusions). An equivalent number (2106 in each group) of new cannabinoid users (defined as individuals dispensed either nabilone or dronabinol, with no dispensing for either drug in the year previous) and controls (defined as new users of a non-cannabinoid drug) were matched on 36 relevant covariates, using propensity scoring methods. Cox proportional hazard regression was used. RESULTS: Rate of hospitalisation for COPD or pneumonia was not significantly different between new cannabinoid users and controls (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.61-1.24). However, significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality occurred among new cannabinoid users compared with controls (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.14-2.39). Individuals receiving higher-dose cannabinoids relative to controls were observed to experience both increased rates of hospitalisation for COPD and pneumonia (HR 2.78; 95% CI 1.17-7.09) and all-cause mortality (HR 3.31; 95% CI 1.30-9.51). CONCLUSIONS: New cannabinoid use was associated with elevated rates of adverse outcomes among older adults with COPD. Although further research is needed to confirm these observations, our findings should be considered in decisions to use cannabinoids among older adults with COPD.

Exclusive cataract surgical focus among ophthalmologists: a population-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: An important potential unintended consequence of the growth of surgical subspecialization is the narrowing of surgical practice among comprehensive ophthalmologists. We investigated trends in the narrowing of surgical practice and the exclusive provision of cataract surgery. DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: All ophthalmologists and all ophthalmologic surgical patients in Ontario from 1994 to 2016. METHODS: We linked several health care databases to evaluate the proportion of ophthalmologists who exclusively provided cataract surgery (and no other ophthalmologic surgery) and the proportion who provided other types of ophthalmologic surgical care. To further investigate surgical focus, we evaluated the proportion of surgical cases within each surgical area for each ophthalmologist. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2016, the proportion of ophthalmologists who exclusively provided cataract surgery rose from 10.0% to 34.9% (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the proportions of ophthalmologists providing other types of subspecialized surgical care were stable over the study period. Cataract surgeons showed high degrees of focus with a median percentage of surgical cases approaching 100% in all years. Among exclusive cataract surgeons, the median annual cataract case volume increased from 138 (interquartile range: 87-214) to 529 (interquartile range: 346-643) between 1994 and 2009 (p < 0.0001) and then plateaued. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1994 and 2016, exclusive cataract surgical focus among ophthalmologists in Ontario rose dramatically from 1 in 10 to 1 in 3 surgeons. This evolution was similar among recent graduates and established ophthalmologists. Our data may have important implications for policies regarding surgeon human resources as well as residency and fellowship training programs.